What is it about?
The purpose of this paper is to explore the role of qualitative research in causality, with particular emphasis on process causality. In one paper, it is not possible to discuss all the issues of causality, but the aim is to provide useful ways of thinking about causality and qualitative research. Specifically, a brief overview of the regularity theory of causation is provided, qualitative research characteristics and ontological and epistemological views that serve as a potential conceptual frame to resolve some tensions between quantitative and qualitative work are discussed and causal processes are explored. This paper offers a definition and a model of process causality and then presents findings from an exploratory study that advanced the discussion beyond the conceptual frame.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
A major conclusion of this study is that qualitative research plays a critical role in causal inference, albeit an understated one, when one takes an enlarged philosophical view of causality. Equating causality solely with variance theory associated with quantitative research leaves causal processes locked in a metaphoric black box between cause and effect, whereas qualitative research opens up the processes and mechanisms contained within the box. This paper reframed the discussion about causality to include both the logic of quantitative studies and qualitative studies to demonstrate a more holistic view of causality and to demonstrate the value of qualitative research for causal inference. Process causality in qualitative research is added to the mix of techniques and theories found in the larger discussion of causality in HRD.
Perspectives
Elisabeth Bennett (http://www.cps.neu.edu/faculty/faculty-bios/elisabeth-bennett.php ) is the lead author on this paper
Dr Rochell McWhorter
The University of Texas at Tyler
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Opening the black box and searching for smoking guns, European Journal of Training and Development, September 2016, Emerald,
DOI: 10.1108/ejtd-07-2015-0049.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page







