What is it about?

This case-study looks at how three institutions think about and implement multi-level description for archival collections with unique content. It discusses the reasons for this approach, including specific researcher needs and the materials' characteristics. Since most archival collections are described at the collection level, this has meant that the institutions used approaches that go beyond the typical archival standards, including item-level description and transcription.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

Many collections can be adequately described at the collection level, but some benefit from multi-layered description. Natural sciences field books provide an example of how institutions are meeting these increased description needs, using current schema and standards, as well as developing new methods when needed. It also demonstrates how the institutions work to develop similar methods when possible and why they sometimes choose to deviate.

Perspectives

This case study discusses a challenge dealing with collections that are not adequately described using standard archival methods. The institutions in question have a long-standing relationship, and so have been able to work together and build on each other's expertise to develop the current methods.

L Parilla
Smithsonian Institution

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Excavating archival description: from collection to data level, Digital Library Perspectives, August 2017, Emerald,
DOI: 10.1108/dlp-11-2016-0043.
You can read the full text:

Read

Resources

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page