What is it about?

A dominant belief is that the continuing encroachment of the market economy into everyday life is inevitable, unstoppable and irreversible. Over the past decade, however, a small stream of thought has started to question this commercialization thesis. This paper seeks to contribute to this emergent body of thought by developing a ‘‘whole economy’’ approach for capturing the multifarious economic practices in community economies and then applying this to an English locality.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

This reveals the limited commercialization of everyday life and the persistence of a multitude of economic practices in all neighborhood-types. Participation rates in all economic practices (except one-to-one unpaid work and ‘‘off-the-radar’’ unpaid work) are higher in relatively affluent populations. Uneven development is marked by affluent populations that are ‘‘work busy’’, engaging in a diverse spectrum of economic practices conducted more commonly out of choice, and disadvantaged populations that are more ‘‘work deprived’’, conducting a narrower array of activities usually out of necessity.

Perspectives

The paper provides evidence from a western nation of the limited commercialization of daily life.

Professor Colin C Williams
University of Sheffield

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Rethinking the commercialization of everyday life: a “whole economy” perspective, foresight, October 2010, Emerald, DOI: 10.1108/14636681011089989.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page