What is it about?
Integrating the behavioral theory of leadership, the componential theory of creativity and the self-determination theory (SDT), the study tests the relationships between leadership, work motivation (intrinsic motivation, integrated extrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation) and employee-level innovation (innovative work behavior and innovation outcomes) in a work setting. Data were collected using a survey questionnaire from 493 scientists working in India’s largest civilian research and development (R&D) organization. The Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) method was used to test the hypothesized relationships between the study variables. The study found evidence for positive relationships between leadership, employee autonomous motivation (intrinsic and integrated extrinsic motivation), and employee-level innovation. The study shows that extrinsic motivation is positively related to innovation only when the value of rewards is integrated to one’s sense of self (integrated extrinsic motivation). Extrinsic motivation, otherwise, is not related to innovation. The study makes important contributions to theory and practice. First, while extrinsic motivation is considered bad for innovation, the study provides evidence that integrated extrinsic motivation complements intrinsic motivation and encourages employee-level innovation. Second, the study shows that leaders can aid the process of development of autonomous motivation by displaying positive behaviors. Third, the study validates the mediating role of autonomous motivation for the leadership-innovation relationship. The study provides an insight into the underlying process through which leaders can impact innovation at the workplace.
Featured Image
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Relationships between leadership, motivation and employee-level innovation: evidence from India, Personnel Review, March 2020, Emerald,
DOI: 10.1108/pr-11-2019-0595.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
Be the first to contribute to this page