What is it about?
This paper aims to increase the transparency of information in official anti-money laundering rating data to assist evidence-informed decision-making in compliance, policy-making and research. Persistent failure to transform available data into information for knowledge and insight suggests that the risk has been realized that impressionistic judgments or politicized interests drive the policy agenda at least as much as objective evidence or substantive economic and social goals.
Photo by Pepi Stojanovski on Unsplash
Why is it important?
Official anti-money laundering ratings offer surprisingly little policy-relevant information. Any reluctance to generate policy-relevant information from the industry’s primary data set or disinclination to engage constructively with a growing body of independent critical policy effectiveness evidence calls into question whether implementing anti-money laundering controls with some prospect of achieving substantial societal benefits, or perpetuating the current system, prevails.
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Anti-money laundering ratings: uncovering evidence hidden in plain sight, Journal of Money Laundering Control, October 2019, Emerald,
You can read the full text:
The only site about anti-money laundering effectiveness curated by someone with a PhD in AML effectiveness, quoted in The Economist, Forbes, Politico, Reuters, and US Senate testimony describing the modern anti-money laundering experiment as arguably the least effective anti-crime measure, anywhere, ever. Profound failure, however, signals opportunity for profound value: an order of magnitude reduction in crime, harm, regulatory risk, and compliance costs.
The following have contributed to this page