Conviction without confession: a case example of information seeking dialogue-based interviewing

What is it about?

This paper explores a modern approach to suspect interviews called Information Seeking Dialogue-Based (ISDB) interviewing, which focuses on creating open communication and gathering detailed information rather than pressuring for a confession. Using the case of Adam Strong, who was convicted of two murders in Ontario, Canada, we analyze how Detective Paul Mitton applied this method during a 12-hour interview. By building rapport, presenting evidence strategically, and maintaining a non-confrontational tone, Det. Mitton elicited important admissions from Strong without coercion. These statements played a critical role in Strong’s conviction, even without a direct confession. This case highlights the effectiveness of ethical and evidence-based interviewing techniques in achieving justice while upholding legal and professional standards.

Featured Image