Publication not explained
This publication has not yet been explained in plain language by the author(s). However, you can still read the publication.
If you are one of the authors, claim this publication so you can create a plain language summary to help more people find, understand and use it.
Featured Image
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Among others, cut-marks are archaeological evidence: reply to 'Archaeological evidences are still missing: a comment on Farina et al. Arroyo del Vizcaino Site, Uruguay' by Suarez et al., Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, October 2014, Royal Society Publishing,
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2014.1637.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
