What is it about?

This prospective study compared the quality of the history (Hx), physical examination (PE), diagnosis, and treatment (Tx) of patients with hand injuries as performed by emergency department (ED) physicians with varying training backgrounds. 93 physicians reported 465 cases. Physicians of lesser training were found to be more meticulous about documenting history and following tetanus protocols, but they ordered more tests and were less likely to perform or document adequate treatment.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

This research provides insight into whether residency training improves the quality of care for patients with hand injuries in the ED. There are some specific areas where less trained physicians differed, like being more meticulous with history taking and tetanus protocols but ordering more tests. This suggests opportunities to improve care through targeted training. Hand injuries are very common ED presentations, so improving their management has the potential to benefit many patients. Understanding how physician training impacts care quality is key to improving overall ED care.

Perspectives

As one of the authors of this study comparing emergency physicians with different training backgrounds, I believe these findings highlight some important considerations regarding residency training and its impact on clinical care. When we embarked on this research, we hypothesized that physicians who had completed residency training would provide measurably higher quality care for hand injury patients than those without residency training. However, in several areas, the less-trained physicians were actually more thorough in their evaluations and adherence to protocols. While surprising, these findings lead me to conclude that residency training alone may not be enough to improve care for common outpatient conditions like hand injuries. There are clearly some knowledge and practice gaps that continuing education initiatives could address more efficiently than the broad focus of a 3-4 year residency. Our study also shows the value of directly observing and comparing physician practices to make evidence-based assessments about the impact of training programs. I believe this methodology could be useful for identifying strengths and weaknesses in a way that allows targeted improvements to physician education. Ultimately, our goal is to promote the highest quality emergency care. I hope our study provides an impetus for this critical evaluation and innovation in physician training. The focus should remain on improving patient outcomes.

Thomas F Heston MD
University of Washington

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: A COMPARISON OF CARE RENDERED BY ED PHYSICIANS WITH VARYING MEDICAL BACKGROUNDS, Southern Medical Journal, September 1990, Southern Medical Association,
DOI: 10.1097/00007611-199009001-00071.
You can read the full text:

Read

Resources

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page