What is it about?

What was already known? Biologic therapy is usually given to patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) after they have failed to respond or do not tolerant methotrexate. Patients with systemic JIA do not seem to respond as well to the usual tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) and because of their unique genetics and disease pathways, interleukin (IL)-1 and 6 inhibitors seem more appropriate to use. From 2010 in the UK, the IL-1 inhibitor anakinra (currently unlicensed) and IL-6 inhibitor tocilizumab are the more common biologics used in patients with systemic JIA. The aim of this study was to investigate real-world short-term responses in children and young people with systemic JIA starting tocilizumab or anakinra. What was discovered? The Biologics for Children with Rheumatic Diseases (BCRD) cohort study collects data on patients starting biologic therapy for JIA. Between 2010 and 2016, 76 patients with systemic JIA starting either tocilizumab or anakinra consented to participate in the register; 54 starting tocilizumab and 22 starting anakinra. Patients starting anakinra were more likely to be starting it as a first-line biologic, with consequently shorter disease duration, and more likely to have a history of macrophage activation syndrome (MAS). After one year of treatment, 42% of patients achieved an ACR paediatric 90% response, 51% achieved minimal disease activity, and 39% achieved clinically inactive disease. However, there were no differences in response between patients on tocilizumab versus anakinra. There were no other clinical factors associated with achieving any of the three outcomes. By one year, 89% of patients on tocilizumab were still on therapy compared with 59% of anakinra patients (p=0.002). One-third of the patients who stopped anakinra reported injection-related problems.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

This is the first study to show that in the UK, approximately half of the patients with systemic JIA treated with tocilizumab or anakinra achieve a minimal disease state, and two-fifths achieved either a significant clinical short-term response or inactive disease by one year. It is important to demonstrate that treatment response appeared to be similar between tocilizumab and anakinra treated patients. However, more patients seemed to stop anakinra, with one-third of those stopping anakinra reporting injection-related problems.

Perspectives

After working on effectiveness of etanercept in JIA, I was keen to investigate the effectiveness of both tocilizumab and anakinra in patients with systemic JIA. It uses data from the Biologics for Children with Rheumatic Diseases (BCRD) study. It has also been presented at a national and an international conference.

Dr. Lianne Kearsley-Fleet
University of Manchester

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Short-term outcomes in patients with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis treated with either tocilizumab or anakinra, Rheumatology, August 2018, Oxford University Press (OUP),
DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/key262.
You can read the full text:

Read

Resources

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page