What is it about?
We found that there were several shortcomings to Lee and Bond's (2018) study of Randilen WMA. These were to do with: Equating Ecological Outcomes With Livestock and Wildlife Densities; Methodological Conundrums in Attributing Change in Semi-Arid Environments; Mischaracterizing Community-Based Conservation.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
Although we agree with Lee and Bond that more research is needed to measure the success of community based natural resource management projects, we show that research cannot overlook some key aspects.
Perspectives
Although we agree with Lee and Bond that more research is needed to measure the success of community based natural resource management projects, we show that research cannot overlook some key aspects.
Mr Peadar Brehony
University of Cambridge
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Bringing back complex socio-ecological realities to the study of CBNRM impacts: a response to Lee and Bond (2018), Journal of Mammalogy, October 2018, Oxford University Press (OUP),
DOI: 10.1093/jmammal/gyy118.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
