What is it about?

Some FTAs/customs unions restrict the use of duty drawbacks which may work against WTO rules. The nature of international trade has changed dramatically. Today, intermediate goods account for nearly 60% of the world merchandise trade, with the import content of the average export amounting to 40%. Global value chains increase the importance of duty drawback—a common practice of refunding duties on imported inputs either incorporated in finished goods for export or re-exported in the same state. Despite their great role in promoting overseas sales of products, drawback programmes have been handled under regional trade agreements (RTAs) in different ways due to a divergence of opinion on their pros and cons. This article provides a legal assessment of drawback schemes as permitted and prohibited within preferential trade areas. The main conclusion is that the no-drawback rule contained in many RTAs can have negative implications for non-parties, lacks justification under World Trade Organization’s rules, and needs to be liberalized.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

This was a hot issue in Korea-EU FTA negotiations and will possibly affect other RTAs too

Perspectives

Advances some suggestions for RTA-making in a WTO-consistent way as regards duty drawbacks

Professor Sherzod Shadikhodjaev
KDI School

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Duty Drawback and Regional Trade Agreements: Foes or Friends?, Journal of International Economic Law, August 2013, Oxford University Press (OUP),
DOI: 10.1093/jiel/jgt020.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page