What is it about?
I discuss how officers and prisoners negotiate order to produce a manageable, stable, predictable, peaceful and relatively habitable prison environment. I demonstrate that in the context of prison’s radical deficit in legitimacy, exacerbated by a corrupt, under-reformed, post-totalitarian state, non-conformity with legal norms might be more legitimate than legal conformity.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
This article broadens the debate about power and order by introducing a case study from a non-‘Western’ context. I argue that prisoners and officers, apart from utilitarian compromises, also employ moral reasoning in their power negotiations.
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Compromised Power and Negotiated Order in a Ukrainian Prison, The British Journal of Criminology, March 2017, Oxford University Press (OUP),
DOI: 10.1093/bjc/azx012.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page







