What is it about?
In the effort to protect children from sexual harm, laws have been created that require some juvenile offenders to be listed on public sex offender registries—laws originally designed for adults. This chapter explores whether applying these policies to minors is appropriate, necessary, and supported by the public. It reviews current registration laws, the psychological research behind them, and whether the assumptions driving these laws hold up to evidence. The authors also examine how public opinion on these policies can be shaped by prejudice, especially against already stigmatized groups like LGBTQ youth and teens from racial and ethnic minority groups, and how different motivations, such as a desire for punishment versus preventing future harm, influence support for registration. Drawing from this research, the authors consider the broader consequences of these laws for both child victims and youth placed on registries, and what this means for crafting policies that protect without causing unnecessary harm.
Featured Image
Photo by Janosch Lino on Unsplash
Why is it important?
The research provides important insight into public opinions about applying sex offender registration laws to juveniles. By highlighting common concerns and misunderstandings, it helps show why these laws may lead to unfair stigma for young people. The authors encourage policymakers to carefully weigh the effects of these laws on youth rehabilitation and their chances to reintegrate into society.
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Applying Sex Offender Registry Laws to Juvenile Offenders, January 2014, Oxford University Press (OUP),
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199934218.003.0005.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page







