What is it about?
Mammograms BI-RADS 4 and 5, from High Specialty Regional Hospital of Oaxaca (HRAEO, internal dataset) and the National Cancer Institute (INCAN, external dataset), were analyzed. The morphology was analyzed using a circularity descriptor (к), and the texture was analyzed using the mean height/width ratio of the extrema descriptor (ρ). These results were compared with cancer/benign histopathology, which was binarily classified using ANNs. The best internal testing results were obtained with a one-hidden-layer ANN with 100 neurons, which successfully classified all high-density mammograms from patients with breast cancer in our internal dataset. External testing consistently yielded lower evaluation metrics across all ANN models, with reductions of at least half. The proposed morphology (к) and texture (ρ) descriptors show promise for detecting breast cancer in raw mammograms, with radiological findings, in a local context. However, their poor external performance highlights the need for substantial further work before this approach can be deemed suitable for broader diagnostic applications
Featured Image
Photo by Sandip Kalal on Unsplash
Why is it important?
Research has recently been conducted using an Oaxaca population from Mexico. We found four rare breast cancers from HRAEO histopathology: one inflammatory breast cancer with an international frequency of < 5% of all tumors, one apocrine carcinoma, one malignant phyllodes tumor with a global frequency of < 1% of all tumors, and one secretory carcinoma with a worldwide frequency of < 0.1% of all tumors. We proposed analyzing whole-breast regions in mammograms because breast cancer alters the morphology and textural patterns of breast tissue. A large number of features can be extracted from radiological images. Still, only morphology (к) and texture (ρ) descriptors were employed as a carefully selected set of features, since this approach may yield a more robust and clinically interpretable model. As a result, we conducted a proof-of-concept study to assess whether these descriptors could effectively classify mammograms. This machine learning technique employs traditional computer vision analysis and leverages an ANN, using a smaller database than deep learning techniques.
Perspectives
We used analysis of cranio-caudal mammograms with radiological findings using machine learning and traditional programming descriptors extraction. This approach could serve as the basis for developing another program to analyze mammograms from patients with partial mastectomy to detect recurrence, as it only requires mammograms from one breast, unlike the typical deep learning AI that uses mammograms from both breasts. While proposed the descriptors performed well within our internal dataset, their poor external performance highlights the need for significant further work before this approach can be deemed suitable for broader diagnostic applications.
M.Sc. Flavio Ernesto Trujillo Zamudio
Hospital Regional de Alta Especialidad de Oaxaca
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Morphological and textural descriptors analysis of digital mammograms with radiological findings to support breast cancer detection using artificial neural networks, Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express, January 2026, Institute of Physics Publishing,
DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/ae2f65.
You can read the full text:
Resources
Morphological and textural descriptors analysis of digital mammograms with radiological findings to support breast cancer detection using artificial neural networks
Data sources for "Morphological and textural descriptors analysis of digital mammograms with radiological findings to support breast cancer detection using artificial neural networks"
Figure 5. Morphology (κ) and texture descriptors (ρ10, ρ100) from craniocaudal raw mammograms of 3 patients with breast cancer and 3 patients with benign pathology
Figure 5. Morphology (κ) and texture descriptors (ρ10, ρ100) from craniocaudal raw mammograms of 3 patients with breast cancer and 3 patients with benign pathology. Descriptor values are average results, and values after ‘±’ are their standard deviation. The mammograms in this figure are for presentation purposes to improve image visualization. This figure shows mammograms and their descriptors from patients with (A) benign phyllodes tumor, (B) fibrocystic changes, (C) sclerosing adenosis, (D) invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), (E) invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC), and (F) ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Mammograms from patients with benign histopathology tend to exhibit greater circularity than the results from patients with breast cancer for similar texture results. Regarding the texture descriptors, those from benign mammograms tended to have higher values for ρ10 and ρ100, whereas breast cancer mammograms showed similar circularity values.
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page







