What is it about?

War, business, and democracy can intersect in complex ways. In India, mining companies operate throughout a war zone between the government and a Maoist insurgency. Mining companies promised that their activities would benefit local populations, but over-reliance on the government to implement development initiatives eroded public faith. The Maoists used the implementation gap to recruit fighters and build public support through an anti-state and anti-corporate ideology. While traditional political ecology interpretations often blame corporations alone for negative mining consequences, this article explores how governance failures can also act as conflict triggers in mining districts.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

Understanding the interrelation effects between these actors can enable a broader understanding of not only the Maoist conflict in India but also how the political ecology of war influences business and conflict dynamics in resource-rich but war-ridden developing states.

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: The Political Ecology of War in Maoist India, Politics Religion & Ideology, December 2012, Taylor & Francis,
DOI: 10.1080/21567689.2012.732017.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page