What is it about?

In 2013, Gibraltar was accepted as a full member of UEFA after long years of struggle. The accession period was marked by a strong Spanish veto that successfully led to the rejection of the application in 2007. But how did Spain lose its influence on UEFA decision-making later on? Referring to the lobbying literature on influence mechanisms, I argue that Spain’s main strategy of withdrawal threat was not credible anymore after 2007. It was a period when La Liga was losing its competitiveness, UEFA was increasing the amount of monetary distributions to football clubs, and Spain was suffering from an economic crisis. As a result, a threat of withdrawal became less influential than Gibraltar’s repeated litigation strategy and Gibraltar became UEFA’s 54th member.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

The paper provides an insight into UEFA decision-making and applies the findings from interest group literature to a unique environment. It focuses on the post-decision-making stage and discusses how actors can lobby after a decision was already given.

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Accession of Gibraltar to UEFA: How did Spain lose influence?, Soccer and Society, April 2016, Taylor & Francis,
DOI: 10.1080/14660970.2016.1171212.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page