What is it about?

Book Review of Ariella Azoulay and Adi Ophir, “The One-State Condition” (Stanford Studies in Middle Eastern and Islamic Societies and Cultures, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2012)

Featured Image

Why is it important?

One of the most frustrating features of the vast literature that has been written on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is that it lacks nuance. The conflict is so complex, so protracted, so bitter and so bloody that people find it hard to maintain objective scholarship, take a step back and strive hard to really fathom the causes of this brutal reality. Unknowingly, and sometimes knowingly, they drift from academic scholarship to ideological propaganda. This book, from its back cover endorsements, and from its very first pages, tells its readers that if they wish to read a nuanced, balanced history of the conflict they should go elsewhere. This book is not about the many shades of grey of reality. It is a story about evil people on the one side who do horrible things to other people. The authors of this book, like many subjective authors before them, passed the fine line between academic writing and political platform. Once they have passed that line, critical readers must take every assertion that Azoulay and Ophir are making not merely with a grain of salt, but with spoonful of salt.

Perspectives

The story of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is not one sided. There are no angels in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. In this book, however, the emphasis is put squarely on the Israeli wrong-doings. The Israelis are active. The Palestinians are passive or reactive. The Israelis are occupiers. The Palestinians are victims.

Professor raphael cohen-almagor
University of Hull

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: The one-state condition, Israel Affairs, October 2015, Taylor & Francis,
DOI: 10.1080/13537121.2015.1083699.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page