What is it about?
The article examines postal regulation in three EU countries, namely Germany, France and the UK. It asks two questions: First, how politicians have delegated regulatory powers to independent agencies. Second, how these regulators do operate in practice. It examines formal arrangements in depth, and compares de facto independence and regulatory practice. The conceptual framework combines the literatures on delegation and comparative capitalism.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
The evidence from postal regulation in these countries reveals a striking discrepancy between formal arrangements and actual regulatory practice. We would not easily predict the ways in which regulators operate based on their formal independence. In order to grasp the dynamics post-delegation, the varieties of capitalism typology proves more fruitful than the expectations derived from the literature on delegation. The paper points to the importance to study the dynamic and longitudinal effects of institutional settings.
Perspectives
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Between commitment and control: varieties of delegation in the European postal sector, Journal of European Public Policy, December 2010, Taylor & Francis,
DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2010.513581.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page