What is it about?
An opinion piece questioning where disability has been in humanitarian discourses and practices linked to the Ebola epidemic and people termed Ebola survivors.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
In this article, I question where ‘disability’ has been in humanitarian discourses and practices linked to the Ebola epidemic. Policy and practice have generally focused on issues linked to biosecurity in relation to West Africa but not on creation of disability linked to breakdown of health systems. Those same discourses of containment and biosocial risks are now being used in relation to people who have survived Ebola but have disabling symptoms.
Perspectives
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Neoliberal policy, chronic corruption and disablement: biosecurity, biosocial risks and the creation of ‘Ebola survivors’?, Disability & Society, February 2016, Taylor & Francis,
DOI: 10.1080/09687599.2016.1145384.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page