What is it about?

Assessing the changing role of the emerging powers in global climate change negotiations, with special attention to Brazil, we ask why they have agreed to voluntary reductions at home without formalising those commitments in ways that might persuade other large emitters to make similar binding commitments.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

We argue that for very large emitters, the climate issue does not evince the ‘global commons’ logic often attributed to it. Instead, since their actions can directly affect climate outcomes alone or in small groupings, large emitters are more responsive to domestic cost-benefit calculations, making international commitments based on shifting interest group pressures at home.

Perspectives

In Brazil, a coalition of ‘Baptists and bootleggers’ found principled and interest-driven reasons to support new climate commitments after 2007.

Professor Eduardo Viola
University of Brasilia

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Brazil and the politics of climate change: beyond the global commons, Environmental Politics, September 2012, Taylor & Francis,
DOI: 10.1080/09644016.2012.698884.
You can read the full text:

Read

Resources

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page