What is it about?
In July 2011, the European Parliament (EP) stopped providing a written translation of its proceedings. Some years later, it seems apposite to look back and ask: What is kept and what is lost without the EP translating? To answer this question, the present paper adopts the first (modern diachronic) corpus-assisted discourse analysis study (MD-CADS) carried out within translation studies by drawing on the discourse-historical approach (DHA) and corpus linguistics (CL) tools. Hence, along DHA lines, the paper proceeds from texture through strategies to content by focusing on CL key keywords and detailed consistency. It performs analysis upon the European Comparable and Parallel Corpus archive, compiled at the Universitat Jaume I (Spain). This study shows that MD-CADS is a potential source of data for triangulation with other, more qualitative, approaches.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
It draws on the Discourse Historical Approach (DHA) and implements it via a Modern Diachronic Corpus Assisted Discourse Analysis (MD-CADS).
Perspectives
This paper is pretty original. It combines DHA and MD-CADS and focuses on key keywords while putting forward synchronic/comparative and diachronic analyses.
Professor MARIA CALZADA PEREZ
Universitat Jaume I
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: What is kept and what is lost without translation? A corpus-assisted discourse study of the European Parliament’s original and translated English, Perspectives, September 2017, Taylor & Francis,
DOI: 10.1080/0907676x.2017.1359325.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
