What is it about?

Modern theory for statistical hypothesis testing can broadly be classified as Bayesian or frequentist. Unfortunately, one can reach divergent conclusions if Bayesian and frequentist approaches are applied in parallel to analyze the same data set. This is a serious impasse since there is a lack of consensus on when to use one approach in detriment of the other. To resolve this historical lack, a unified approach is derived in this paper.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

Fundamentals of frequentist and Bayesian approaches for hypothesis testing are revisited in order to state the analytical arguments for a reconciling theorem. This theorem is then proved for the general case of any hypothesis testing problem.

Perspectives

There is no point on discussing superiority from any of the parts since frequentist and Bayesian hypothesis testing methods are always equivalent under the unified perspective.

Professor Ivair Ramos Silva
UFOP

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: On the correspondence between frequentist and Bayesian tests, Communication in Statistics- Theory and Methods, August 2017, Taylor & Francis,
DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2017.1359296.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page