What is it about?
Beginning in 2012 the Association for Psychological Science (APS) started to advocate for alternative statistical reporting practices other than the standard null hypothesis statistical test (NHST) and for replication of reported
Featured Image
Photo by Viktor Forgacs on Unsplash
Why is it important?
Over the years, many researchers have decried the over-reliance on NHST in psychology and the twin problem of failures to replicate previous important
Perspectives
The results provide a window into how different journal editorial policies and practices can play an important role, but only to the extent that the authors and readers of these journals have a buy-in that they are willing and able to embrace recommended best practices in the discipline.
Dr. Abdulrazaq A. Imam
John Carroll University
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: A snapshot look at replication and statistical reporting practices in psychology journals, European Journal of Behavior Analysis, October 2019, Taylor & Francis, DOI: 10.1080/15021149.2019.1680179.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
