What is it about?
People think they know what journalism is, but asked to define it, they get clueless in a hurry. This is even true of journalism professors and their students. This essay sets out to define journalism in a simple, practical and comprehensive way.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
Today, everyone can be a journalist, and everyone can do journalism. But does that mean everything that anyone published on the Internet is a work of journalism? How about fake news, satire, ideology-driven blogs, and thinly veiled publicity stunts? These are probably easy to recognize as not journalism, but things get grey pretty quickly. So, how exactly can we draw the line without going crazy with circular logic? This question can matter in practical ways, too: who gets a press pass to a cup final game? when you get a subpoena to identify someone who may have committed a crime, can you claim a right to protect your confidential "source"?
Perspectives
I am a journalism professor at Ryerson University in Toronto, Canada, and some years ago, I got tired of hearing myself stumble over the question of what journalism is. I found no real definition out there, so I decided to start working on one myself.
Prof Ivor Shapiro
Ryerson University
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Why democracies need a Functional Definition of Journalism now more than ever, Journalism Studies, February 2014, Taylor & Francis,
DOI: 10.1080/1461670x.2014.882483.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page







