What is it about?

There has been a shift in university teaching over the past decades to emphasize student achievement and persistence through high-impact practices and collaborative learning. While research supports the effectiveness of these pedagogical strategies, it can be difficult to implement them on large campuses. Yet, many criminal justice professors assign students to work in small groups. This study, conducted at a university with a large underrepresented student population, found that the composition of student groups in one criminal justice class can affect the perceived benefits students receive in that class, in other classes, and in general. We found that students placed in a small group with classmates who shared some criminal justice classes reported more student-initiated collaborative learning, expanded support networks, and improved grades in shared courses compared to students in small groups with classmates who shared no classes. This simple intervention has the potential to mimic learning-communities with similar benefits.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

University instructors can quickly and easily improve collaborative learning amongst students by taking into consideration students' other class when assigning groups.

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Student Learning Groups: Does Group Composition Matter?, Journal of Criminal Justice Education, December 2017, Taylor & Francis,
DOI: 10.1080/10511253.2017.1398830.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page