Monitorial education – not a cheap method of teaching
What is it about?
This article show that contrary to what has previously been claimed, monitorial education does not seem to have been a cheap method of teaching and it did not primarily help to save money (at least not in Sweden).
Why is it important?
For the first time in an internationally published study the economic effects of monitorial education is thoroughly investigated. The selected case is Sweden and some 30 schools that were established in that country during the 1820s. The investigation focuses on teachers’ salaries, school buildings and teaching material.
The following have contributed to this page: Dr Esbjörn Larsson