What is it about?
The article analyses the effects of different types of humour (e.g. irony, sarcasm, mockery) on euphemistic speech from different semantic taboo areas (e.g. death, sexuality, minorities, politics) to show whether the euphemistic value is maintained or not.
Photo by charlesdeluvio on Unsplash
Why is it important?
Our findings show that not all euphemisms remain euphemistic when specific types of humour and specific speaker intensions are applied. The typology we provide helps to understand where this twist happens, and how.
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: When humour questions taboo, Pragmatics & Cognition, December 2021, John Benjamins, DOI: 10.1075/pc.20027.hei.
You can read the full text:
The following have contributed to this page