What is it about?

Fire research, and hence fire management, have long been dominated by a physical model of fire, which works well for going fires and built environments, but not well for natural landscapes and ecological concerns. The paper describes three perspectives on fire - physical, biological, cultural - and where they best apply.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

The physical model does not address ecological goods and services, and the social context of wildland fire, which are arguably the areas of fire management most in need of research. The paper proposes alternatives, each of which is both consistent and complete.

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Problems, paradoxes, paradigms: triangulating fire research, International Journal of Wildland Fire, January 2007, CSIRO Publishing,
DOI: 10.1071/wf06041.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page