Publication not explained
This publication has not yet been explained in plain language by the author(s). However, you can still read the publication.
If you are one of the authors, claim this publication so you can create a plain language summary to help more people find, understand and use it.
Featured Image
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Is direct coronary stenting the best strategy for long-term outcome? Results of the multicentric randomized benefit evaluation of direct coronary stenting (BET) study, American Heart Journal, October 2002, Elsevier,
DOI: 10.1067/mhj.2002.125324.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
