What is it about?
The objective of this study is to examine whether the Greater Toronto Area (GTA) is moving toward or away from sustainable transportation through exploring the spatial and temporal changes of urban form and travel behavior, related policies and responses to these changesduringtheperiodbetween1986and2006.TransportationservicesandinfrastructureintheGTAareregulatedbydifferentgoverning bodies and at different scales and levels. Support for sustainable transportation initiatives has varied across governments and over time. It is important at this point to review the main initiatives taken by different governing bodies over the last several decades to achieve sustainable transportationintheGTA.ByanalyzingtheTransportationTomorrowSurveydatathroughthelasttwodecades,itcanbedeterminedwhether these initiatives have been successful in making transportation in the GTA more sustainable or, alternatively, whether more measures should be taken to achieve transportation sustainability. The major finding of this study is that, overall, the GTA is not moving in the direction of sustainable transportation, and gives credence to the idea that demand-management interventions are needed as a transport policy to make transportation systems more sustainable in this area.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
The main objective of this study was to examine whether the GTA is moving toward or away from sustainable transportation. This objective was met through the analysis of data obtained from the TTS data. The data suggest that, overall, the GTA is not moving in thedirectionofsustainabletransportation,andgivescredencetothe idea that demand-management interventions are needed. In addition, two main lessons can be generalized from this study. Therearedifferencesbetweenthedowntownareaandtherestof thecityofTorontoandtherestoftheGTAregionsintermsofurban development, travel behavior patterns, and local transportation policies. The analysis showed that employment density is highest in PD1, fairly high throughout the city of Toronto, and comparatively low in the rest of the GTA. Despite the policies that encourage residentstousethetransitsystemastheirmainmodeoftransportation, the substantial decentralization of employment densities and areas from denser (PD1) to low density (the rest of the GTA regions) is a major obstacle to improving transit ridership in the GTA. Decentralizedareasaredifficulttoserveefficientlyandcosteffectivelyby urban transit. Automobiles share is increasing as the distance from the PD1 increases. Public-transit shares constitute a small portion of mode share in the rest of the city of T
Perspectives
The major contribution of road congestion in the downtown is the automobiles originating from the rest of the city of Toronto as well as from the rest of the GTA regions. The analysis showed that the trips destined to the PD1 area are four times higher than the number of outbound trips originated from it. Public-transit share within the PD1 area is dominant. The usage of public transportation exceeds the usage of automobile. In addition, PD1 area achieved some progress toward reducing the automobiles mode share on the expense of walking and cycling.
Dr Esmat A. Zaidan
Hamad Bin Khalifa University
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Urban Form and Travel Behavior as Tools to Assess Sustainable Transportation in the Greater Toronto Area, Journal of Urban Planning and Development, September 2015, American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE),
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)up.1943-5444.0000227.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page







