What is it about?

This chapter looks at how worries about the unravelling of Arctic ecosystems as a result of global warming, and speculative methods of possibly refreezing the region by putting substances in the sky reflecting more sunlight into space - 'solar geoengineering' - combine to making 'The Arctic' recognised as a thing that countries might - and even should - govern. Geoengineering the Arctic is motivated by well-founded ecological concerns, but scientists and campaigners use models and discourse that also ignore the local realities of indigenous populations and great power politics. This helps create a global imaginary of the Arctic as an discrete ecosystem that can easily be technically manipulated by others to have more ice. Yet the Arctic it is a region with a (colonial) history, multiple claims and embedded interests attached to it. Glossing over this ignores how politically hard it would be to artificially lower temperatures and repair sea ice. In general it is often assumed in International Relations that the objects of politics and governance are self-evident and that science is politically neutral. However, considerable political work goes into marking out which bits of reality can legitimately be steered and operated on - 'governance-objects'. E.g. until the 18th Century, the idea that a 'population' should be governed, improved in terms of health etc. did not exist. When it was produced by census material and state policy, this legitimated a huge extension of state power. Today the climate is becoming a 'governance-object', and the politics of that are important, also to the Arctic.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

This chapter builds on and contributes to a growing argument that the objects of politics are almost as important as the subjects - i.e. we cannot just focus on the actors, states, non-state actors (which are the usual focus of international relations) and understand what is going on. The Arctic is an increasingly important global space, as well as a local space, and 'solar geoengineering' is an example of how politics happens not just in foreign policy institutions but in the laboratory. How the Arctic is 'made' via knowledge practices, science and policy-discourse, into a supposedly governable entity, is not just innocent scientific research, but part of a global political process.

Perspectives

The Arctic is a fascinating space that has changed through the years from being a space of human habitation, individual heroic exploration, colonial domination, scientific discovery, local autonomy and now also a theatre of global climate politics and technological experimentation. I believe that all those practices play into the current debate about solar geoengineering and the crisis of the Arctic ice. For that reason it is maybe a microcosm of an emerging/future world-ecological geopolitical crisis.

Professor Olaf Corry
University of Leeds

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Globalising the Arctic Climate: Geoengineering and the Emerging Global Polity, December 2016, Nature,
DOI: 10.1057/978-1-137-50884-3_4.
You can read the full text:

Read

Resources

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page