What is it about?
On cosmopolitan theories, everyone deserves equal respect and consideration as ultimate units of moral concern independent of citizenship or other affiliation. On non-cosmopolitan theories citizenship, status, or other affiliations help determine what we owe to others. Surprisingly, non-cosmopolitans can grant that everyone deserves equal respect and consideration as ultimate units of moral concern and cosmopolitans can hold that citizenship status or other affiliations may help determine what we owe to others. Cosmopolitans and non-cosmopolitans usually disagree about whether or not it is acceptable to give priority to the claims of compatriots over, more needy, outsiders. Often the crucial claim in non-cosmopolitan arguments is that non-humanitarian obligations of legitimacy or justice only pertain within states.4 This chapter takes issue with this claim.
Featured Image
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Cosmopolitan Commitments: Coercion, Legitimacy and Global Justice, January 2014, Springer Science + Business Media,
DOI: 10.1057/9781137286406_6.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page