What is it about?

When a molecule is impacted by a high-energy particle, eg. a 70 eV electron, multiple fragment ions are formed. In such cases, there is a distinct possibility that a given fragment was formed via two different pathways. The key observation in this paper, is that each pathway can be associated with a coherent signature that the fragment yield acquires during the reaction. By mapping the coherence of each fragment ion, we show that it is possible to determine which pathway the fragments follow, and in some cases, we find that fragments were formed by two distinct pathways. This capability is demonstrated through the analysis of strong-field dissociative ionization of dicyclopentadiene, which proceeds through two distinct mechanisms: an intact-bridge pathway and a broken-bridge pathway. By distinguishing the coherent signatures associated with each, we can directly identify the competing routes leading to specific fragments, providing new insight into the dynamics of complex molecular ionization.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

High-energy molecular fragmentation remains a challenging process to understand and accurately predict using current theoretical models. This study introduces an approach to disentangle competing reaction pathways in such complex processes, which frequently yield numerous fragment ions through multiple concurrent mechanisms.

Perspectives

Coherence mapping reveals how fragments retain phase relationships that reflect the dynamics of their formation, providing direct insight into competing reaction pathways. By analyzing these coherent signatures, researchers can identify whether fragments arise from single or multiple mechanisms, offering a powerful tool for unraveling complex chemical dynamics.

Marcos Dantus
Michigan State University

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Coherence mapping to identify the intermediates of multi-channel dissociative ionization, Communications Chemistry, May 2024, Springer Science + Business Media,
DOI: 10.1038/s42004-024-01176-5.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page