What is it about?
We often talk about ourselves as being in conflict. "Part of me is anxious, but I know I should be calm," we might say. For over a century, most psychotherapy has viewed the mind in a similar way: as a collection of warring parts that need a rational manager—a stable "observer-self"—to get them in line. But what if that inner manager, the part of you trying so hard to fix your feelings, is actually creating the conflict in the first place? This is the radical question at the heart of Deconstructive Inquiry (DI), a new therapeutic model introduced in a recent paper. The approach suggests that psychological distress begins the moment our thoughts create an imaginary boundary, splitting our experience into an "observer" and something "observed." Once that split happens, the observer spends all its energy trying to control, change, or accept the feelings it now sees as separate from itself. Instead of strengthening this inner manager, DI helps people notice the exact split-second this division is made. For example, a client with performance anxiety might say, "I know what a good presentation looks like, but I feel like a fraud." A DI therapist would guide them to see that the "ideal presenter" and the "fraudulent self" were born in the same thought. Without that comparison, is the anxiety still a problem, or is it just the energy of speaking? When people see this mechanism directly, the sense of inner conflict often dissolves on its own. The goal isn't to repair a fragmented self, but to recognize that the self was never truly fragmented to begin with. The paper describes this shift as "the difference between renovating a prison cell and realizing the door was never locked." Supported by findings in neuroscience that show our sense of a solid self is a moment-to-moment brain process, this framework offers a new path for therapy. Instead of a long-term project of self-improvement, DI provides a method for rapid, insight-driven change by getting to the root of how we construct our own distress, revealing the wholeness that exists before the first division is ever made.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
The importance of Deconstructive Inquiry lies in how it completely reframes the therapeutic task. For decades, most therapy has focused on the content of our minds—the troubling thoughts, painful memories, and difficult feelings—treating them like smudges on a mirror that need to be constantly cleaned and polished. This approach is unique because it suggests the problem isn't the reflection, but the unnoticed belief that we are separate from the mirror itself. It argues that the "self" we deploy to manage our thoughts is just another momentary reflection, not a permanent entity standing apart from the glass. This shift is what makes the work so powerful. It moves the goal from an endless project of wiping away smudges to a single, liberating act of recognition. It reveals that our sense of being flawed or in conflict is a perceptual error, not a fundamental state of being. In essence, while other therapies teach you better techniques for cleaning the reflection, Deconstructive Inquiry invites you to see that you are the mirror itself—already whole, clear, and undivided.
Perspectives
After years of clinical work and research, I kept running into the same wall. The existing models of psychotherapy, as brilliant as they are, all seemed to be operating on a flawed premise. They were offering increasingly sophisticated tools to help people manage, integrate, or heal a "self" that I've come to believe is a cognitive illusion. It felt like we were all meticulously rearranging the furniture in a room, without ever questioning if the room itself was real. This paper is my attempt to point directly at the projector. To me, the core insight of Deconstructive Inquiry is not just an idea; it's a direct observation of the simple, overlooked trick the mind plays on itself. The constant effort to "fix" ourselves—to become a better, calmer, more authentic version of who we are—is the very engine that creates our suffering. The problem isn't that we are broken; the problem is the deeply ingrained belief that there is a "we" that can be broken in the first place. Writing this paper was an exercise in translation. The core realization is experiential and immediate, but for it to be of service, it had to be grounded in the language of science and philosophy. I've tried to build a bridge from this direct insight into the worlds of phenomenology, neuroscience, and clinical practice, not to dilute the insight, but to make it testable and accessible to a field that is, rightly, skeptical of claims that can't be investigated. My personal hope is that this work does more than just introduce another therapeutic "model." I hope it challenges the very goal of therapy itself. The aim isn't to build a stronger self, but to find the freedom that comes from recognizing we are not the limited, solid entities we imagine ourselves to be. It's about seeing that the conflict is a self-tightening knot: the harder the "self" pulls to fix things, the tighter the knot becomes. This paper is simply an invitation to stop pulling, to look closely, and to watch the knot dissolve on its own.
Arie Greenleaf
Nova Southeastern University
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Beyond the fragmented self: The theory and practice of deconstructive inquiry., Psychology of Consciousness Theory Research and Practice, September 2025, American Psychological Association (APA),
DOI: 10.1037/cns0000442.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page







