What is it about?
This study suggests an explanation for the advantage women have in recognizing and evaluating emotions and pain experienced by others. Several theoretical frameworks have attempted to explain this sex difference. Here, we wanted to verify whether women use different visual information from the face than men. By comparing the areas of the face used by men and women to discriminate between varying intensities of expressions of pain, this study raises two sex differences in the visual strategies used. First, it corroborates the woman advantage, women are indeed more efficient at discriminating expression intensities, requiring less visual information than men. Second, it suggests that women rely on larger regions of the face, which seems to completely mediate their advantage. Two hypotheses could explain these results. Women could integrate more efficiently information from different areas of the face, thus processing the face as a whole. Alternatively they could be more flexible in the use of information contained in these areas. In this case, if one part of the face is not accessible, they will be able to use another almost as efficiently. Women would then opt for a more holistic or flexible processing of facial information, while men would rely on a specific but rigid integration strategy.
Photo by Aarón Blanco Tejedor on Unsplash
Why is it important?
Efficient communication of pain has been tied to the evolution of the human race as in some situations, it can become a matter of life and death for the person experiencing it. It is therefore important to identify which factors could hinder or facilitate this process — in this case, the biological sex of the observer. Before we can put in place effective action plans to facilitate the non-verbal communication of pain, notably in the fields of health or public safety, we must understand how it works.
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Facial expression of pain: Sex differences in the discrimination of varying intensities., Emotion, September 2022, American Psychological Association (APA), DOI: 10.1037/emo0001156.
You can read the full text:
The following have contributed to this page