What is it about?
Identity has been used in many different ways that differ in seemingly irreconcilable way: identity as stable vs. changeable, personal vs. social, individual vs. cultural-contextual, developing gradually vs. fluctuating. But identities are not either-or any of these dichotomies; they reflect both sides of all of them. In this paper, we use assumptions about the nature of complex systems that explain phenomena like the weather and the movement of schools of fish to describe a model of identity that bridges across these dichotomies. We also describe how this model can be used to study identity and to guide interventions to facilitate desirable identity development.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
The identity model that we describe explains how a person's action emerges from their role identity. Thus, it can explain why a person or a team of people behave in a particular way in a certain situation, and in another way in other situations. It can also explain why a person experiences tension and indecision, or resist interventions to change their behavior. Furthermore, it can explain how contexts influence identity change, with an emphasis on promoting people's agency in their own identity formation, and thus guide educational and professional development design.
Perspectives
Developing this identity model and collaborating on elaborating it for this article has been a personally meaningful experience since it continuously resonates in our own lives, helping us in reflecting on who we are in our different roles and how we can reflect, explore, and take agency to form our own identities.
Avi Kaplan
Temple University
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: A complex dynamic systems perspective on identity and its development: The dynamic systems model of role identity., Developmental Psychology, November 2017, American Psychological Association (APA),
DOI: 10.1037/dev0000339.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page