What is it about?
The current study suggests that instruments used in Routine Outcome Monitoring (ROM), specifically the BHM-20, may not be accurate in measuring client outcomes longitudinally. This is problematic because it means that client feedback data collected in session about their experience in therapy is not accurate. The current study offers a refined version of the BHM-20 called the BHM-17, which can be used longitudinally with improved accuracy.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
ROM is reliant on the use of measures that produce reliable outcome data.
Perspectives
This article aims to emphasize the importance of testing commonly used ROM measures for longitudinal invariance.
Jeremy Coleman
University of Denver
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Longitudinal measurement invariance of the Behavioral Health Measure in a clinical sample., Journal of Counseling Psychology, January 2022, American Psychological Association (APA),
DOI: 10.1037/cou0000524.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
