What is it about?

A total of 342 non-Gypsy Spanish participants filled out a questionnaire about their relationship to one of three outgroups: Maghrebians, Gypsies, and Latin Americans. Hierarchical cluster analysis showed that a three-cluster solution was most fitting for every outgroup. ANOVAs applied to the three clusters indicated significant differences in prejudice, perceived similarity, and social dominance. Referring to Gypsies the largest effect size was observed in manifest prejudice (η2 = .63), in Maghrebians, the largest effect size was observed in subtle prejudice (η2 =.77), while for Latin Americans, perceived similarity had the largest effect size η2 ( = .60). T

Featured Image

Why is it important?

The results reveal a need to modify existing measures of integration; we recommend using questionnaires to measure behaviors that members of the majority would be willing to implement.

Perspectives

The evaluation of the behaviors of the members of the majority is fundamental in order to evaluate programs of acculturation.

Assistant Professor CARMEN MARTÍNEZ
Universidad de Murcia

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Prejudice, Social Dominance, and Similarity among People who Favor Integration of Minorities, The Spanish Journal of Psychology, April 2016, Cambridge University Press,
DOI: 10.1017/sjp.2016.16.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page