What is it about?
Social norms and values, congealed into customary rules of behaviour, provide a stable and enduring context to economic life that acts positively or negatively on economic activity. Despite their methodological and theoretical differences, Mill and Marshall share in common the belief that individual economic decisions should be related to the informal institutional structure -the social norms and moral values of a particular society- together with the formal institutional frame
Featured Image
Why is it important?
Mill and Marshall have suggested that individual economic decisions are fully embedded in their social environment. Thus, in order to explain the economic phenomena, from simple transaction processes to long term development, they adopted a broader perspective by including the social frame inside which economic choices are made, divulging the role of custom, yet in a quite distinctive way.
Perspectives
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Customary rule-following behaviour in the work of John Stuart Mill and Alfred Marshall, Journal of Institutional Economics, October 2014, Cambridge University Press,
DOI: 10.1017/s1744137414000502.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page