What is it about?

Social norms and values, congealed into customary rules of behaviour, provide a stable and enduring context to economic life that acts positively or negatively on economic activity. Despite their methodological and theoretical differences, Mill and Marshall share in common the belief that individual economic decisions should be related to the informal institutional structure -the social norms and moral values of a particular society- together with the formal institutional frame

Featured Image

Why is it important?

Mill and Marshall have suggested that individual economic decisions are fully embedded in their social environment. Thus, in order to explain the economic phenomena, from simple transaction processes to long term development, they adopted a broader perspective by including the social frame inside which economic choices are made, divulging the role of custom, yet in a quite distinctive way.

Perspectives

It appears in this research paper that both Mill and Marshall held a composite view in explaining the importance of customary rules in shaping economic behaviour and competing the spirit of enterprise

Professor Michel S Zouboulakis
University of Thessaly

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Customary rule-following behaviour in the work of John Stuart Mill and Alfred Marshall, Journal of Institutional Economics, October 2014, Cambridge University Press,
DOI: 10.1017/s1744137414000502.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page