What is it about?

This article describes an important aspect of the intellectual tradition of Japanese political theory in terms of his early work, focusing on the Japanese political theorist Fujita Shōzō’s political and scholarly activities.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

Not surprisingly, Fujita has been chiefly considered a thinker or a historian of ideas, due to his being a pupil of Japan's brightest political scientist, Maruyama Masao. It must be stressed, however, that his scholarly works do not confine his academic scope to their ingredients; they are composed of theoretical requisites for the disciplinary activity of political theory, as can be seen particularly in his early contributions. He requires his theory to constitute integral aspects of practice, experience and perspective on the basis of his political concerns and practices in terms of detachment realism. From this perspective, I explore how Fujita changed his primary purpose from criticising Japan's ‘Tennō system’ (Tennōsei) to criticising its ‘high-speed growth’ (kōdo seichō) by highlighting the psychological transformation of his self-critical and self-reflective political thinking and acting according to his optimistic state of ‘hope’ (kibō) and his pessimistic state of ‘despair’ (zetsubō), especially in terms of his early work.

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: The political theorist, Fujita Shōzō: between his sense of hope (kibō) and his sense of despair (zetsubō), Japanese Journal of Political Science, July 2018, Cambridge University Press,
DOI: 10.1017/s1468109918000166.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page