What is it about?

I show that labor share has not fallen as much as previously thought if we remove capital depreciation. The capital stock has more types of equipment that need to be replaced more frequently, like computers. Payments to capital owners have increased to cover these additional costs.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

Labor share has a central role in many of the recent controversies about income inequality. I show that there is not a strong, stable relationship between inequality and labor share. This finding is evidence that the recent increase in income inequality is not due to increasing returns to capital owners.

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: IS LABOR'S LOSS CAPITAL'S GAIN? GROSS VERSUS NET LABOR SHARES, Macroeconomic Dynamics, July 2017, Cambridge University Press,
DOI: 10.1017/s1365100516001000.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page