What is it about?

Despite its postmodern articulation, the spatial turn is productive for literary studies because, paradoxically revisiting Kant’s modern attempt to base the structure of knowledge on the presumably scientific character of geography and anthropology, it has improved methods of historical contextualization of literature through the dialectics of ontologically heterogeneous spaces. The author discusses three recent appropriations of the spatial thought in literary studies: the modernization of traditional literary geography in the research of the relations between geospaces and fictional worlds (Piatti, Westphal), the systematic analysis of the genre development and diffusion with the help of analytical cartography (Moretti), and the transnational history of literary cultures (Valdés, Neubauer, Domínguez, etc.). In conclusion, the author presents the tentative results of the research project “The Space of Slovenian Literary Culture: Literary History and the GIS-Based Spatial Analysis,” which might represent a matrix for further developments of the spatially-oriented literary science. Using GIS technologies, the project maps and analyzes data about the media, institutions, and actors of Slovenian literature in order to explain how the interaction between “spaces in literature” and “literature in spaces” has historically established a nationalized and esthetically differentiated literary field.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

The article offers a critical survey of the role of the spatial turn in literary studies and presents methods and results of a research project of GIS-mapping Slovenian literary culture.

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: From Spatial Turn to GIS-Mapping of Literary Cultures, European Review, January 2015, Cambridge University Press,
DOI: 10.1017/s1062798714000568.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page