What is it about?

The article highlights the impact of family backgrounds and educational mobility on marriage descisions. Having been supported by their family members during their years of education, graduates from rural family backgrounds feel obliged to also consider the interests of their family, particulary of those family members who supported their years of education. In their marriage decisions, these graduates thus face the dilemma of having not only to balance their own material and emotional interests, but also to reconceile the hopes and plans of important others.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

The article highlights the perspective of students and graduates from poor rural family backgrounds. Different from their peers in the village who usually end up in labour migration, these university students invest years of heavy educational discipline for the goal of longterm upward mobility into urban society and white collar employment. Yet, after graduation their rural family background remains central to their life planning, particularly when it comes to the question of who to marry. The particular situation of "educational migrants" in Chinese society as a intermediate group between the usual categories of "rural" and "urban" as well as "peasant" and "educated person" has so far seldom been described in the China literature.

Perspectives

Based on field work in rural Gansu, the article highlights the perspective of students and graduates from poor rural family backgrounds on the issue of finding a suitable marriage partner. In their marriage decisions, these graduates feel they do not only have to balance their individual material and emotional interests, but also have to consider the interests of their family members, particularly those who have supported their education.

Dr. Helena Obendiek
Max Planck Insitute for Social Anthropology

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Rural Family Backgrounds, Higher Education, and Marriage Negotiations in Northwest China, Modern Asian Studies, April 2016, Cambridge University Press,
DOI: 10.1017/s0026749x15000499.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page