What is it about?
This article contributes to an emerging scholarly debate over the support displayed by key Azhari ulama for the 3 July 2013 coup in Egypt and the subsequent massacres of anticoup protesters. I focus on the Islamic legal justifications articulated by the former grand mufti of Egypt Ali Juma, which academics have contextualized primarily in relation to quietist precedents from late medieval Islamic political thought or his Sufi background. By contrast, I consider Juma's justifications as representative of a nationalist discourse that has its historical origins in the protonationalism of Rifaa al-Tahtawi (d. 1873).
Featured Image
Why is it important?
The argument in this article has wider implications for our conceptualization of the contemporary Islamic tradition. If, as scholars have argued, the Islamic tradition is a framework for inquiry rather than a set of doctrines, then in the 19th century a concern for the nation and its future became a key part of that framework. I contend that these additions came to redefine the worldview and politics of the ulama in terms of national progress and its horizon of expectations.
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: CLEANSING THE NATION OF THE “DOGS OF HELL”: ʿALI JUMʿA'S NATIONALIST LEGAL REASONING IN SUPPORT OF THE 2013 EGYPTIAN COUP AND ITS BLOODY AFTERMATH, International Journal of Middle East Studies, July 2017, Cambridge University Press,
DOI: 10.1017/s0020743817000332.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page







