What is it about?
This article offers a new interpretation of Kant’s cosmopolitanism and his anti-colonialism in Toward Perpetual Peace. Based on historical evidence not previously considered alongside Perpetual Peace, I suggest that Kant’s leading concern is the negative effect of European expansionism and intra-European colonial rivalry on the possibility of peace in Europe. To maintain the integrity of his philosophy of history, Kant distinguishes between war between particular dyads, in particular spaces, and with particular non-state actors to put forward new typology of antagonism. I examine the implications for Kant’s system of Right concluding that his anti-colonialism co-exists with his racial hierarchy.
Featured Image
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: It's Not about Race: Good Wars, Bad Wars, and the Origins of Kant's Anti-Colonialism, American Political Science Review, July 2017, Cambridge University Press,
DOI: 10.1017/s0003055417000223.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page







