Well-posed and ill-posed behaviour of the μ(I)-rheology for granular flow
What is it about?
In light of the successes of the Navier–Stokes equations in the study of fluid flows, similar continuum treatment of granular materials is a long-standing ambition. This is due to their wide-ranging applications in the pharmaceutical and engineering industries as well as to geophysical phenomena such as avalanches and landslides. Historically this has been attempted through modification of the dissipation terms in the momentum balance equations, effectively introducing pressure and strain-rate dependence into the viscosity. Originally, a popular model for this granular viscosity, the Coulomb rheology, proposed rate-independent plastic behaviour scaled by a constant friction coefficient . Unfortunately, the resultant equations are always ill-posed. Mathematically ill-posed problems suffer from unbounded growth of short-wavelength perturbations, which necessarily leads to grid-dependent numerical results that do not converge as the spatial resolution is enhanced. This is unrealistic as all physical systems are subject to noise and do not blow up catastrophically. It is therefore vital to seek well-posed equations to make realistic predictions. The recent μ(I)-rheology is a major step forward, which allows granular flows in chutes and shear cells to be predicted. This is achieved by introducing a dependence on the non-dimensional inertial number I in the friction coefficient μ. In this paper it is shown that the μ(I)-rheology is well-posed for intermediate values of I, but that it is ill-posed for both high and low inertial numbers. This result is not obvious from casual inspection of the equations, and suggests that additional physics, such as enduring force chains and binary collisions, becomes important in these limits. The theoretical results are validated numerically using two implicit schemes for non-Newtonian flows. In particular, it is shown explicitly that at a given resolution a standard numerical scheme used to compute steady-uniform Bagnold flow is stable in the well-posed region of parameter space, but is unstable to small perturbations, which grow exponentially quickly, in the ill-posed domain.
Why is it important?
The μ(I)-rheology represents a major breakthrough in the study of liquid-like flows of granular material. We find that for many commonly studied flows the model is well-posed but when the inertial number I is too small or too large, the equations are ill-posed. These findings mean that numerical simulations of flows that include these regimes will give erroneous and often catastrophic results. As ill-posedness is defined as an unbounded growth of infinitesimal wavelength perturbations, making the solution grid in numerical calculations finer actually speeds up the growth of noise. This growth leads to unphysical results with initially small imperfections coming to dominate the solution and ever larger magnitudes at ever faster rates are observed as the grid-scale is reduced. We prove these claims by means of an asymptotic linear stability analysis performed especially for small wavelength perturbations. We then solve the full two-dimensional transient equations as a validation of our mathematical predictions. An important test case comes from flows on inclined frictional planes. The μ(I)-rheology was designed to capture the observation that such flows were only steady and uniform for a finite range of non-zero inclination angles. Application of our criteria for well-posedness, and related numerical simulations, confirm that for a large part of this range the flows are indeed steady and uniform. However, we show that for larger angles, still within the observed steady range, numerical computations spontaneously generate perturbations that grow, dominate the solutions and ultimately cause numerical methods to fail.
The following have contributed to this page: Professor John M N T Gray and Thomas Barker
In partnership with: