What is it about?
In thinking about democracies as complex systems we are faced with the question of whether we should promote only the forms of political participation we deem more valuable or whether we should be open to other forms too. For instance, it is rather clear that if we want to enhance deliberative democracy we might want to promote more deliberative engagement. But what role should we give to non-deliberative politics? I argue that deliberative democrats should insist on the need for deliberative democratic institutions, should demand greater deliberative engagement from powerful actors (when invested with political powers) and should be wary of imposing deliberative forms of participation on the public.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
This paper helps understanding the complex relationship between deliberative and non-deliberative forms of participation to politics and envisioning ways forward to promote deliberative democracy.
Perspectives
As the deliberation grows in importance we need to reflect on possible ways to boost its democratic potential.
Andrea Felicetti
Scuola Normale Superiore
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Non-deliberative politics in deliberative democracy: distinct approaches for different actors, Italian Political Science Review/Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica, June 2017, Cambridge University Press,
DOI: 10.1017/ipo.2017.16.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page







