What is it about?
We argue that capital and labour income taxation has non-trivial effects on intrahousehold allocations, i.e on the way households share resources amongst members. In our model couples bargain over the intrahousehold allocation under limited commitment. In this framework more wealth improves commitment and gives rise to insurance gains within the household. Our theory motivates these gains by the empirical observation that wealth, in contrast to labor income, is a commonly held resource within households. Based on this observation we study whether eliminating capital taxes from the economy, and raising labor taxes to balance the government's budget, may generate welfare gains to married households. We illustrate that the quantitative effects from this reform are rather small. We attribute the small effects to the life cycle pattern of wealth accumulation and to the impact of labor income taxes on household risk sharing: In particular, we show that higher labor taxes may make the limited commitment friction more severe, even though they may make the distribution of labor income more equitable within the household.
Featured Image
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: CAPITAL TAXES, LABOR TAXES AND THE HOUSEHOLD, Journal of Demographic Economics, September 2015, Cambridge University Press,
DOI: 10.1017/dem.2015.7.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page







