What is it about?

The article claims that the distinct syntactic behavior of mono-morphemic and non mono-morphemic anaphors (reflexives) follow from the interaction of movement theory and hereby suggesting a relationship between binding phenomena, switch-reference and clitic climbing.

Featured Image

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: On the interaction between antecedent-government and binding: the case of long-distance reflexivization, September 1991, Cambridge University Press,
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511627835.006.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page