What is it about?

Have you ever wondered why we say "man bag" but never "woman bag"? Or why "girlboss" started out as a compliment and ended up as an insult? This research looks at a group of playful, sometimes controversial new words, like mansplaining, manspreading, girlboss, manny, and SheEO, all built by adding a gender marker ("man-", "girl-", "she-") to an existing word. At first glance these words seem like internet jokes. But look closer, and they turn out to reveal something deeper about how language, gender, and society shape one another. Using a vast database of news articles and online comments, the study tracks how these words are actually used in the real world, not just how dictionaries define them.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

This research captures a linguistic phenomenon in real time, using terms that are still actively evolving on social media, in newsrooms, and in everyday conversation right now. What makes this study distinctive is that it treats these words not as trivial internet slang, but as a window onto the relationship between language, gender, and society. It shows that a word like "mansplaining" isn't just funny shorthand — it's a tool that turns a private annoyance into a publicly recognised, nameable problem, sometimes even shaping real-world policy (several cities have introduced fines for "manspreading" on public transport).

Perspectives

"It's just semantics", people often say — but it really isn't. Language is not just play. These small, often joked-about words carry real weight. For anyone interested in gender equality, feminism, workplace language, or simply how internet culture reshapes English, this research offers a rare close-up look at language change as it's still happening, showing that the words we casually toss around in comment sections and headlines are doing far more social work than we tend to notice.

Maria Szymańska
University of Lodz

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Gendered Neologisms and Social Transformation, August 2026, Cambridge University Press,
DOI: 10.1017/9781009785785.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page